Monetize
Affiliate Marketing, Search Engine Obfuscation, and Internet Profiteering

The top 3 most powerful changes for ON PAGE optimization
Saturday April 15th 2006, 8:30 am
Filed under: Higher Rankings

The common belief these days, and rightly so, is that off-site linking controls the search engines. How many different sites link to yours and what text they use in that link are the strongest factors determining how your pages rank. However, I believe that we have seen some recent shifts in Google that turn up the dial for a few on-page factors. These “on-page optimizations”, or things you can do to your own site, are not as easy as adding meta-tags or some extra text in the footer.

If it were as easy as adding meta-tags, invisible to the end user, saavy webmasters would manipulate the system by stuffing the tags (as they did in the ’90s). To combat that, I believe page placement and visibility are important factors in how much relevance your on-page optimization contributes to your rankings. To put it another way, if you want to make major upgrades in your on-page relevance, you’re going to have to make it visible to the end user. These visibility factors include:

  1. Title tag. The single biggest on-page factor that is the most easily modified. It should be original for each and every page on your site. The most important keywords are near the front of the tag. Don’t stuff; over 60 characters is likely a waste. Make it sound natural. OK, none of this is revolutionary in the least.
  2. The second factor, and one that I believe has been raised in importance, is internal linking. Treat your internal links just as you would treat your external links. They should be keyword-rich and placed high on the page. Instead of labeling your Home button with “Home”, put your keyword or site title in there. If you have important sub-pages or extremely important product pages, try and link to them (keyword-rich) from every other page on your site. This tells the robots that the page you’re linking to internally is important and should carry weight.
  3. Reduce the text fluff. If you’ve never used a robot simulator then you should try it out and see what your page looks like to the average search robot. In digging through various sites as a robot, I’ve found a few places where you can either trim the fluff or keyword stuff without much consequence — form select boxes. When you have a long list of <option> tags, the search spider cannot use the select box, but it still sees the option tags as text. What you do with them is up to you– if you need to place some keywords on every page but don’t want to clutter the page to the user, try and make them useful in a select box (going to categories of your products, for example).

And here is the trick in reverse… if you have a long list of categories in a select field, say at the top of the page, you will find that it is taking up the most valuable space on every page (the header) and it pushes your real content further down. Get rid of it with javascript! If you have javascript use document.write to spit out the options, it will be invisible to spiders, but still useful to your viewers. And you’ve done nothing illegal. I’ll demonstrate below…

An example of a category select box that takes up too much valuable space and reduces your keyword density on every page:

<select name=”category”>

<option> Aardvarks </option>
<option> Anteaters </option>
<option> Antelope </option>
<option> Bears (greatest threat to America) </option>
<option> Bumblebees </option>
<option> Cats </option>
<option> Dogs </option>
etc…

</select>

If your list is 100 items long, you are wasting space. To the search engines, your select box looks like this:

Aardvarks Anteaters Antelope Bears (greatest threat to America) Bumblebees Cats Dogs

To the robots, this looks like a meaningless keyword list without links. Reduce that waste with javascript:

<select name=”category”>

<script language=’javascript’ >
document.write(‘<option> Aardvarks </option>’);
document.write(‘<option> Anteaters </option>’);
document.write(‘<option> Antelope </option>’);
</script>

</select>

You’ve now removed an entire chunk of repeating text on every page– increasing the relevant keyword density– yet not affecting the user’s experience or doing anything wrong in the eyes of the engines!


 Digg it  Add to del.icio.us

7 Comments so far
Leave a comment

Hello.

Your theory is interesting and i have used the same action several times, but is you put the left links into tables and leave the first table emty wouln’t this also do the trick becaus the spiders read from right to left and uses the first table and then jumps over to the next at the left? By doing this the spider will read the first emty table, then the content table and then over to the next table that have link content?

Comment by tavikki.no 04.16.06 @ 3:42 am

True; you can re-arrange the order that the spider reads the text with tables or with absolutely positioned DIVs. However, the text is still on the page and still reducing relevant keyword density. If you write the text out with Javascript, you have effectively removed the words from the page– increasing the relevance of the words that remain. This may be important if your menu is 100 words long but the rest of the page only has 300 words of content. Thank you for coming by!

Comment by Alex 04.16.06 @ 5:42 am

Good article hoff!

Two more things I use. Once you rank high in the SERPs, you gotta get the user to click the link. To do this:

. Concentrate on the meta description tag. Yahoo shows it more often than the text the person is looking for.

. Use something to attract the user to your link in the search engine in the title. I use “Cool – “. People are drawn to it and just want to see cool things.

Comment by SiCK 04.18.06 @ 7:45 am

Thanks, SiCK!

I agree 100% with your take on the importance of clickability of the listing. If the listing in the results looks like keyword stuffed spam, it isn’t going to generate the CTR it would if it looked more natural. I’ll take a title tag that looks natural with 2 keyphrases in it over one stuffed with 3-5 anyday.

“Cool” is a good trick. Here is one I use– put the price in the title and the meta. If your page is describing a specific item, I’ve found that putting the price in the SE listing is quite effective (assuming price is a selling point on your site):

<title> Hand-painted Vermont Widgets – Low price: $23.95 </title>

Comment by Alex 04.18.06 @ 10:08 am

Good tip on the javascript select box – thanks! you could even put it in a .js external file and reduce the bandwidth overhead that much more. Also – I’m thoroughly convinced that on-page optimization is still alot more important than alot of people claim. Especially with MSN.

Comment by Vectorgraphx 05.01.06 @ 12:51 pm

Nice points made on internal linking, I feel that internal linking can create as much ranking power, when implimented correctly as external links can, most people including SEO’s miss out on one hell of a lot of rankings through ignorance to these points.

Comment by The SEO Expert 03.01.11 @ 12:56 am

When one considers scenario at your fingertips, iпїЅпїЅve to alongside with your determinations.

Comment by uggs 12.19.11 @ 8:35 pm



Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>